Quantitative Investing
Would you like to invest your money? Get in touch with an expert:
Quantitative Investing, also known as systematic investing, involves using mathematical modeling, computer systems, and data analysis to calculate the optimal probability for executing a profitable trade. It is typically conducted by highly skilled teams, primarily led by quantitative analysts. These analysts often combine the expertise of investment analysts, statisticians, and programmers. Due to the complexity of the mathematical and statistical models, it is common for practitioners to hold advanced degrees, such as a Ph.D., in finance, economics, mathematics, or engineering. There are now even programs designed to implement these models. Quantitative models perform well in backtesting (analyzing the success of an investment in advance), but their actual application and success rate are debated. Typically, markets are well-modeled during favorable times. However, during crises or other extraordinary events influencing the market, implementing quantitative investing becomes more challenging. This is because mathematical models often rely on assumptions that cannot be accurately made during times of crisis.
Robert Merton was one of the founding fathers of quantitative financial theory. At that time, implementing quantitative investing was labor-intensive as computers were not yet in use. Some of the earliest quantitative studies also led to other theories in finance, including the basis for portfolio diversification and the foundation of Modern Portfolio Theory. The application of quantitative finance and calculus led to many other common instruments, including one of the most famous, the Black-Scholes option pricing formula. This formula not only assists investors in valuing options and developing strategies but also helps provide liquidity to the markets.
Quantitative strategies are now widely accepted in the investment community and are employed by investment funds, hedge funds, and institutional investors. They are typically referred to as Alpha Generators or Alpha Gens.
While predicting investment success is highly challenging, models can be highly useful in assessing potential success. This reliance, of course, assumes the model's accuracy. Generally, the advantage of quant strategies lies in the use of very fast computers. This speed enables the exploitation of market inefficiencies based on quantitative data. Successful strategies can identify trends in their early stages as computers constantly explore scenarios to detect inefficiencies before others do. These models can simultaneously analyze a large group of assets, a capability that a traditional analyst might only handle a few at a time. The models themselves might rely on a few financial metrics like the price-to-earnings ratio, leverage, and earnings growth, or they might incorporate thousands of inputs working together.
Quant models also allow for variations in strategies such as Long, Short, and Long/Short. High-quality quantitative funds pay meticulous attention to risk control. Diversification can be precisely managed by using sector and industry weightings, for instance. Quant funds tend to be more cost-effective because they require fewer traditional analysts and portfolio managers, thanks to computer-based operations.
Another advantage is that the
analysis isn't based on the subjective assessment of an individual. Subjective assessments often carry some degree of emotion. In contrast, a model relies on data and research and remains impervious to emotional influence. Additionally, due to computational power,
a computer can integrate a multitude of scenarios, possibilities, and data into decision-making. Over the years, it has been observed that many actively managed funds struggle to outperform the benchmark in the long term. In summary, quantitative investing
facilitates the rapid and simultaneous evaluation of large volumes of data based on research rather than subjective assessments. It offers a systematic approach to portfolio management.
A model proves useful only if it's accurate. However, models rely on the past, which doesn't always predict the future. While a robust quant team continuously incorporates new aspects into models to estimate future events, it's impossible to consistently predict the future correctly. If certain assumptions are incorrect, the model may yield flawed outcomes. A notable example is the Quant hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), led among others by Myron S. Scholes and Robert C. Merton. The company's models did not account for the possibility of the Russian government defaulting on some of its debts, which had significant repercussions when this scenario occurred. LTCM was deeply entangled in other investment deals, leading to its collapse and impacting global markets.
Quant strategies also require copious amounts of data to accurately model return distributions, which can lead to dilution. Additionally, the success of these strategies often demands a specific investment horizon. They may often fail to outperform the market in the short term.
Fundamental analysis relies on an in-depth assessment of a company's operations, management team, and market opportunities to gauge the attractiveness of a stock. It relies on the expertise of the fund manager to make informed decisions about which stocks to buy and sell.
Fundamental investing is based on metrics such as financial indicators. These are analyzed to determine whether the current market price aligns with the real value of a company, indicating whether it's over or undervalued. Metrics like Price-Earnings ratio, Equity ratio, Price-to-Sales ratio, and Debt levels are used in fundamental analysis. Qualitative factors, such as management quality, are also considered in this analysis.
The quantitative approach employs data-driven analysis to assess a broad universe of stocks. It relies on factors identified over time by portfolio managers and researchers to construct portfolios of stocks with attractive characteristics. These factors have demonstrated outperformance historically and are thus utilized.
Both approaches aim to lead clients to the same financial goals and attempt to outperform a market benchmark.
For instance, consider two equity funds—one traditional and one quantitative—both managed in comparison to the S&P 500® Index (a common US benchmark). Despite sharing the same overall investment objective, the strategies and tools utilized by portfolio managers differ. Generally, quantitative/systematic equity managers view investing as a science, eliminating emotional biases and purchasing stocks with specific characteristics. Fundamental/traditional managers consider investing more of an art, relying on judgment and experience. It can be advantageous to view these two approaches not as opposing but as complementary to one another.
Would you like to invest your money?
Speak to an expert.
Your first appointment is free of charge.
